Virgin Australia delays Boeing 737 MAX order, adds more MAX 10s
Page
- 1
- 2
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Virgin Australia delays Boeing 737 MAX order, adds more MAX 10s
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Virgin Australia delays Boeing 737 MAX order, adds more MAX 10s
Notso Swift
Notso Swift
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 06 Oct 2016
Total posts 32
Albinoni1967
Albinoni1967
Member since 01 Nov 2018
Total posts 4
Give me a A320 or A320 Neo over a 737 any day.
Albinoni1967
Albinoni1967
Member since 01 Nov 2018
Total posts 4
So will Virgin still keep their Airbus A330's which I think are a nice plane, probably the best fleet they've got.
14AspenDrive
14AspenDrive
Member since 19 Jan 2018
Total posts 5
Virgin will never take delivery of a Max 8...ever. By converting the Max 8 orders to Max 10, they are letting down Boeing gently. Scurrah will move to Airbus A321 neo and LR within 12 months. The words MAX anything are poison just like DC anything was in the 80’s. Trump was right...again...Boeing will add a few extra trinkets then put lipstick on the pig and call it the 737 888...999.
DanV
DanV
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 04 Nov 2017
Total posts 101
A330s will still be required for SYD/MEL-PER Transcons and HKG flying in the short term.
Ian_from_HKG
Ian_from_HKG
CX
Member since 05 Jun 2012
Total posts 61
I don't really understand your point; every 737 since the 737-100 in the '60s has only had 2 engines. The issue with the MAX appears to be that due to the size of the engine intake the engine was moved further forward of the wing altering the centre of gravity of the plane as well as creating a source of lift independent from the wing surfaces. Due to an issue with MCAS and the deletion of software that advised on conflicting AoA readings, the plane could, in some circumstances, be difficult and even deadly to handle. At this stage, it is believed the revised software will overcome these issues.
The other issue is that there are still only two AoA sensors on a 737, so if one fails (as does seem to happen), which one does the software trust? Airbuses have three AoA sensors - as it is unlikely two will fail at the same moment and give the same false reading, having the software rely on the two that agree seems an inherently safer approach to me (but then I am not an aeronautical engineer!)
declanr
declanr
Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards
Member since 26 Nov 2017
Total posts 17