Australia to get airline ombudsman, passenger rights charter

Airlines will be made to pay travellers for flight delays and cancellations.

By David Flynn, August 26 2024
Australia to get airline ombudsman, passenger rights charter

Passengers whose flights are cancelled or significantly delayed will receive cash refunds under a new customer rights charter, while an independent airline ombudsman will be given new powers to handle complaints and force airlines to take appropriate action.

These are the key measures in a national Aviation White Paper released today by the Federal Government.

“Too many Australians have been left out to dry when flights are cancelled or disrupted and it’s impossibly complex to get a refund or even contact a company representative,” said Transport Minister Catherine King. 

“Customers deserve to get their money back if they are owed it. Full stop. It’s time to take strong action to protect consumer rights with an Aviation Industry Ombuds (ombudsman) Scheme and charter of customer rights.”

However, the proposed passenger rights charterstops short of passenger compensation schemes in the UK and Europe, where passengers are entitled to compensation payments between $400 and $1000 for delayed or cancelled flights, based on the distance of their trip and length off the delay, while also allowing for how much notice an airline gives passengers.

This was the same model being pursued by the Airline Passenger Protections (Pay on Delay) Bill introduced to the Australian Senate earlier this year by the Liberal and National Party opposition.

While the office of the indep­endent ombudsman wouldn’t be formally set up until 2026, an ‘interim ombudsman’ will be appointed as early as next week to begin drawing up the passenger rights charter, and will be able to receive complaints from next year.

Considered a blueprint for sweeping reform of the Australian aviation industry, the white paper also seeks to allocate more flights for overseas airlines through bilateral air service agreements and negotiate for ‘open skies’-style agreements, and to “reform Sydney Airport slot management arrangements” for the allocation of take-off and landing slots at Sydney Airport and “reduce incentives for anti-competitive slot misuse.”

Both measures are being adopted with the aim of unlocking greater competition in Australia’s skies, including “rebalancing slot allocation towards new entrants.”

The Aviation White Paper’s passenger rights charter and more broadly the ombudsman are the Labor Government’s response to the Airline Passenger Protections (Pay on Delay) Bill introduced to the Australian Senate by the Liberal and National Patry opposition.

Australia’s new ‘bill of rights’ for passengers

While the Customer Rights Charter will cover domestic airlines such as Qantas and Virgin Australia, it could also be extended to international carriers.

To be developed by the indep­endent ombudsman in consultation with the industry and consumer groups, with submissions open until October, this ‘bill of rights’ for passengers will:

  • codify customers’ entitlements to refunds, across all fare types, for flights that are disrupted, cancelled or unreasonably delayed
  • define the length of flight delays that are considered unreasonable
  • qualify reasons for disruptions, delays and cancellations that are considered within the airline’s control (separate to factors such as the impact of weather)
  • require airline make timely communication with passengers in providing services in line with customer rights
  • outline other airline obligations when flights are disrupted, cancelled or delayed, such as providing support to make alternative travel arrangements

“The charter will outline minimum customer service levels, give customers greater certainty about what they can expect when flights are cancelled and delayed and when passenger journeys are disrupted, including in relation to the prompt payment of refunds,” the paper says.

Airlines would be required to issue cash refunds rather than vouchers for credit against future bookings, regardless of the type of fare they have booked – meaning that even the most basic economy ticket would enjoy the same level of protection as more expensive ‘fully flexible’ tickets.

In addition to those refunds, which airlines would be expected to ‘fast track’ and pay within a set time, airlines would have to rebook passengers of cancelled flights.

Airlines currently face no legal requirement to compensate passengers for delayed or cancelled flights; instead, each carrier has its own compensation guidelines covering the likes of meal vouchers and overnight accommodation if required.

Independent airline ombudsman

An independent ombudsman will replace today’s airline-funded Customer Advocate, which is seen as a largely ineffective body, with fewer than 40% of complaints lodged in 2023 being resolved.

Similar to bodies already in place for the telecommunications and financial industries, the airline ombudsman will be charged with enforcing the charter of customer rights and handling complaints, which skyrocketed over recent years in the wake of the pandemic. 

After hearing those complaints, the ombudsman would have the legal power to direct airlines and airports to provide remedies to passengers, while also being able to refer instances of ‘misconduct’ for investigation and enforcement.

Airlines would also have strict reporting requirements on the cause of delays and cancellations.

The creation of an airline ombudsman has been widely supported, with Australian consumer group Choice previously suggesting such a body should be funded by the industry, with a board made of up equal numbers of consumer and industry representatives and an independent chair.

What the airlines say

While Qantas and Virgin Australia have lately warmed to the idea of an independent ombudsman, they have previously railed against compulsory compensation laws such as those of the UK and Europe, where passengers are entitled to between $400 and $1000 for delayed or cancelled flights.

Those payouts are based primarily on the distance of their trip and length off the delay, but also allowing for how much notice an airline gives passengers; compensation is also required if a delay means a passenger misses a connecting flight on the same reservation.

Industry body Airlines for Australia and New Zealand (A4ANZ) – which counts Qantas, Virgin Australia, Regional Express, Jetstar and Air New Zealand among its members – had also warned against considering “airline compensation schemes as a silver bullet for Australian consumers,” saying  compensation schemes “don’t work to reduce delays” and that airlines “are already commercially and financially incentivised to minimise disruptions.”

A4ANZ today steered into welcoming the inevitable, saying the Aviation White Paper struck a good balance of ensuring that temporary challenges were not driving long-term policy decisions, and addressed key issues faced by the sector.

“With airfares and on-time performance returning to pre-pandemic levels, the Government’s announcement of an aviation ombuds scheme and a passenger rights charter represents a sensible and measured approach,” said A4ANZ Chairman, Professor Graeme Samuel.

“We welcome the opportunity to contribute to these policies, ensuring that they are built on principles of shared accountability for all parts of the aviation ecosystem.”

Click here to download the Aviation White Paper in PDF format.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

26 May 2014

Total posts 468

I hope they tackle the problem of oversize passengers that occupy neighbouring seats.  

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

28 Oct 2011

Total posts 465

What do you suggest they should do?

06 Feb 2021

Total posts 63

If you are so large you cannot fit into a standard seat without overflowing into your neighbours space, you should be required to purchase two seats, or pay for a business class ticket.  If you're not prepared to do that, then don't fly, the person sitting next to you has also paid for their ticket, and they're entitled to their (minimal,) amount of allocated space.  There are a miniscule number of people who are overweight for medical reasons, the vast majority are self inflicted. 

Alternatively, and preferably, Governments around the world should have legislated years ago what the minimum seat width and spacing was, and not allowed this ridiculous nonsense of ever decreasing seat size at the same time as the bulk (literally,) of the population, are getting fatter.     

18 Nov 2023

Total posts 21

Excellent idea. Legislate minimum seat width and pitch and then wonder why the price went up. They already offer (more or less) this solution … yesteryear’s Economy seat width and pitch available today … it’s called Premium Economy. It’s been proved over and over and over … offer passengers a bigger seat width and pitch and they’ll take the cheapest lesser seat every time.

seat width hasn't changed on 95% of aircraft. Some A330s are 9 across & some B777s are 10 across. Seqt pitch doesn't equal legroom. You can have same seat pitch but different legroom, by as much as a few inches. It all depends on seat back thickness. New Slimline seats are comfortable, but seat back are much thinner than previous.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

24 Jan 2019

Total posts 13

If the airlines weren’t deliberately shrinking seat this wouldn’t be an issue.  Whether you like it or not the world is getting fatter and airline seats are getting smaller.  

What ? Airlines aren't shrinking seats at all !!!!  Where do you get that crazy idea from ?

31 Mar 2014

Total posts 391

Seats haven't been shrinking. A 737 seat width has always been ~17.5" since the 70's and A320 ~18" since 80's. Pitch has shrunk, but this has little to do with people too wide for the seats.

Seat backs are much thinner, so at same pitch, more legroom. 

18 Nov 2023

Total posts 21

Would you settle for a yesteryear’s seat at a yesteryear’s ‘real’ cost of air travel price? Try PremEcon.

biggest delays caused by air traffic control & weather, which obviously won't be covered

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

06 Jan 2017

Total posts 7

I find it disappointing that the answer often seems to be more legislation.

I think the idea of an independent Ombudsman is a good step, the introduction of mandatory compensation can only really push up costs/fares.

Well, the legislation which in place in Europe. the UK, Canada etc seems to work pretty well in terms of guaranteeing compensation payments for passengers when their flights are delayed or cancelled. If you want to have any standard of compensation, cash refunds, proper 'duty of care' etc then you have to have legislation because the rules need to be enforceable, so they have to be legislated, ie 'made law'. Otherwise every single delayed or cancelled flight would rely on passengers to go to the ombudsman and then for each claim to be considered, a proposed resolution put to the airline, airlines to have their say etc. This is not only WAY too complicated and time-consuming and resource-intensive, but most people would not put in a claim in the first place.

29 Aug 2014

Total posts 22

Europe and UK yes. Canada not so much. The legislation looks good on paper but the regulator isn't effective and there isn't a consumer friendly small claims tribunal like UK MCOL.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

06 Oct 2016

Total posts 173

Let's not legislate and trust the companies in question to do the right thing, oh wait, that didn't work. EU has shown very little increase in fares, as in virtually zero. Now, having said that, regional services may need more support to make them viable, but that has been happening for 100 years

THe compensation scheme is two fold, yes it is better for the consumer, but the most important aspect is the recording and threat/risk of corporate damage. (If no one thinks that is an issue, ask Mr Joyce)

06 Oct 2021

Total posts 10

The right to a cash rather than voucher refund when a flight is cancelled is hardly ground breaking and nothing like EU261 compensation. Chairman's Club membership for the pollies triumphs again over consumer interest.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

09 Jun 2017

Total posts 69

Just wonder if the Ombudsperson will be given a Chairmans Lounge membership?

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

24 Jan 2019

Total posts 13

This is so overdue and I hope it happens quickly.  Hopefully the financial incentive will reduce problems for passengers.  

Not that it will make up for the holiday where I was without my luggage for 36 hours (always carry a change of clothes in hand luggage) .  Or the 12 hour delay in Sydney when we were given vouchers for food or drink and the airport was closed, and the $50 flight voucher (I received after I complained in writing) that could only be redeemed in person at the airlines office.  

Dout if will make the slightest difference. All pr and 1,000 more public servants on massive salaries doing sfa

I would suggest that over 90% of delays due to weather and atc. If airlines have to allow longer between flights, then less utilisation per day leading to higher costs 

13 Oct 2016

Total posts 3

There is only group of people that is going to pay for this compensation and that will be us. Airlines will just increase fares to cover their costs.

Looks great on paper, but in the real world I’m not so sure

26 Sep 2023

Total posts 26

Notably, no real action until after the Federal Election due no later than May 2025.

Long overdue, and Qantas really brought this on themselves with the whole Spring 2023 shemozzle.

1. Qantas brought this upon themselves with not only the mess coming out of the pandemic but also lobbying to block those extra Qatar Airways flights, and the government did itself no favours in bowing to that.

2. Labor really needs to get moving and grant QR's request for extra flights to Australia so they can begin March 2025 and at the same time get a move-on on this 'bill of rights' and the ombudsman's office so both can be in place in early 2025., before the election.

29 Jan 2020

Total posts 35

Refunds for cancelled flights should be payable within 7 days, or the Airlines face a fine.

Why should Qatar get more flights, after the appalling treatment of the Australian women “in transit” in Doha?

Since then the Government granted Turkish Airlines daily capacity into Sydney and Melbourne, far better to get a new Airline to offer more choice.

SCM
SCM

28 Sep 2022

Total posts 16

Stupid, bigoted comment.

cancelled flights due to weather or atc would yield any refunds whatsoever, especially if another flight within 24 hours.

Very little compo will ever b paid, just more red tape. Airlines will have 2 employ more people just to handle it

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

31 Mar 2016

Total posts 30

It needs to apply to international airlines as well- but good luck trying to get anything out of a lesser know Chinese airline or a ULCC…. 

10 Apr 2020

Total posts 16

You could say if some company is agaist this type of set up, then it must be a good idea for the benefit of customers

not sure how any could think it will be a benefit for consumers ?

14 Oct 2016

Total posts 109

Its still very vague on what the charter will contain. The proof will very much be on the pudding.

I think it should be the philosophy of the charter to do the right thing by passengers in all circumstances and if the ombudsman has to be engaged, and then if the airline is at fault, the ombudsman should severally punish the airline. 

I'd like things like if a passenger is downgraded, the passengers fare is readjusted to the lowest economy fare charged to someone on that route in the past 30 days. The same fare perks of the higher fare should carry over. 

There needs to be a financial disincentive in shafting customers, as this is the only way things will improve. 

you're dreaming. SYD curfew is also an issue. About time it was done away with. If an aircraft is flying in from X & is delayed due to weather &/or ATC, then it 1) might not make it into SYD before curfew or 2) might be able to land, but not take off, so stuck for 7 hours & who knows what the crew situation will be then. No compensation in these cases.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

09 Jun 2017

Total posts 69

The big problem here in Australia is that we have 2 airlines that hold all the power conveniently set a high price level for domestic flights. Quite different in Europe and the Americas where there is proper competition among the carriers. For the Australian airlines to warm to this white paper (wonder how much that cost us), they have already run their numbers and worked out how much based on historical cancellation records, they have to increase the cost of fares to cover potential compensation claims. They will include in their provisions going forward, like they do for legal case costs. 

We will wait to see how tough or soft the Customer Rights Charter will be. Looking like A4ANZ will have some input. As for the Consumer Groups, who knows! While the high ranking and decision making pollies continue to accept Chairmans Lounge and Beyond Lounge memberships, I don’t trust that we, the travelling public, will have our interests truly represented.

it will b a total farce. just designed to keep the whingers happy. No airline (apart from Qantas) wants to cancel or delay flights. As far as cancelling every 2nd syd mel flight, well there's usually one 30-60 min later. The con is, pressure could be put on engineers to sign off on an aircraft that is not totally airworthy.

18 Nov 2023

Total posts 21

Weak, but a small step in the right direction for this end of the planet. Let’s get rid of some of the less than ideal words like “unreasonable“ (subjective) and “delayed”. 

Why “delayed”? Because flights can be rescheduled to earlier than convenient … I recently had check-in times advanced from 1000 to 0400. Thanks, but no thanks. And let’s have refunds at an amount that reflects the actual cost of (say) an alternative airline replacement fare at the time of reschedule notification, rather than the price paid (say) six months earlier. And then there’s the issue of “other” arrangements which may go “pear-shaped”. Non refundable accommodation, onward transport, tours, concert/theatre/sports etc bookings.

Compensation for almost any and every thing that depends on the airline fronting up with the prepaid product they contracted to provide.

No, I’m not a financial opportunist … but I object to being an impotent fairy godmother with (currently) no reasonable means of redress.

stop dreaming. Airlines all over the world are in survival mode. They never want to cancel or delay flights. Most delays/cancellations are due to weather or atc & would never ever b any compensation for that. Also pressure maybe put on engineers to sign off on an aircraft that isn't 100% airworthy. Fix the bloody thing on the ground no matter how long it takes. Very hard to fix in the air in most cases.


Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Australia to get airline ombudsman, passenger rights charter