American Airlines, Malaysia Airlines considering premium economy

By David Flynn, November 27 2015
American Airlines, Malaysia Airlines considering premium economy

As first tipped by Australian Business Traveller, American Airlines will launch a full premium economy service on international flights starting in late 2016 – click here for full details.

PREVIOUS | American Airlines and Malaysia Airlines could both launch premium economy class next year, although Oneworld partner Qatar Airways has ruled out adopting better-than-economy seating.

Premium economy is proving increasingly popular with a range of passengers, including self-employed business travellers on a tight budget as well as regular business class travellers who cash in their hard-earned points for an annual family holiday.

"We’re looking at it," American Airlines CEO Doug Parker told Australian Business Traveller earlier this month, after a pause to carefully choose his words. "We think there’s a lot of opportunity there."

Malaysia Airlines is also mulling this middle ground and expects to make a decision early next year, which could see a small premium economy cabin added to its fleet of Airbus A330s at the same time as new lie-flat business class seats (below) are fitted.

Read: Malaysia Airlines reveals all-new business class for Airbus A330s

"We are very happy with business class demand, and this gives us the opportunity to increase the revenue per passenger in the economy class" says airline CEO Christoph Mueller.

"The target passenger is in economy class, and you don't want to cannibalise the business class."

But Qatar Airways says you won't see premium economy anywhere on its fleet.

"We won’t roll out premium economy" affirms CEO Akbar Al Baker in an interview with Forbes.

"I don’t think there is any room for premium economy in our region" Al Baker says, adding that in the airline's current economy cabin "we give you a premium economy seat with an economy class price."

Follow Australian Business Traveller on Twitter: we're @AusBT

David

David Flynn is the Editor-in-Chief of Executive Traveller and a bit of a travel tragic with a weakness for good coffee, shopping and lychee martinis.

04 May 2015

Total posts 261

"We give you a premium economy seat with an economy class price"? Since when was 10-across on a Boeing 777 'premium economy'? It's worse than 'regular economy' on most other airlines...

Singapore Airlines - KrisFlyer

14 Jan 2014

Total posts 340

Not to mention the awful seating they have on their B787 aircraft..

Give Qatar a wide miss thank you!!

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

29 Jul 2013

Total posts 203

Qatar, like Etihad and Emirates, are best avoided unless you're in Business or First.

...Or you're flying in an A380.

Qatar's A380s have 18.5" wide seats in economy. Emirates have 18", and I don't know what Etihad have but I think it would be >18"

If you're in an A380, Economy is good on the ME3. Otherwise, I agree with you.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

15 Dec 2014

Total posts 284

Many people fly them because they think they are 'good' in the Y part.!

30 Mar 2014

Total posts 21

Agree with Dean's comment "Since when was 10-across on a Boeing 777 'premium economy'? It's worse than 'regular economy' on most other airlines...". I actively avoid any airline that thinks this is an acceptable seating configuration

15 Jun 2015

Total posts 9

Qatar are actually the only Middle Eastern carrier to still do 9 abrest in Y

04 May 2015

Total posts 261

Qatar's new 777s are now being delivered with 10-abreast seating in economy, so you might be lucky to get an older 9-across aircraft but could equally get a newer 10-across aircraft.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

26 May 2014

Total posts 464

I have made a couple of leisure trips in premium economy, where the price over economy has been between 25 and 50%.  With these options avalaible Qatar won't see me in their economy class.  The mixed fare options between Australia and Europe with SQ and LH are a good comprimise for many.

AA considering Premium Economy is interesting, but on the other hand, AA's "Economy Plus" (aka "Survivable Economy") product does fill an important niche, and Premium Economy products are usually around twice an Economy Class price.

Who knows... maybe airlines will start to segment the market further, by integrating more Survivable Economy seats into the overall Economy cabin (through the SANTO seat, or through lessening the density in exit rows). I mean they already charge more for extra legroom seats... so combining an extra legroom product with an extra width seat and otherwise giving it standard Economy service, I'm sure the product would fill a niche.

That said, would a "Survivable Economy" product cannibalize demand for a "Business-Lite" type product? That's a legitimate concern but I think if the Business-Lite product is sufficently well-differentiated that won't happen... particularly if the full Business Class is a fully flat bed with direct aisle access and nearly-first-class-level service.

MAS is an interesting case though, since their new Business cabin will be a little bit below JAL/SQ/Cathay/Qantas/etc..  Would a Premium Economy positioned as a "Business Lite" cannibalize their demand? Personally I doubt it but again, it depends on the product's positioning. The service also matters too.

03 Oct 2011

Total posts 39

MAS is an interesting case though, since their new Business cabin will be a little bit below JAL/SQ/Cathay/Qantas/etc..

MAS's new J won't be as good as JAL's new J, or CX's, but they look to be far better than QF's:  MAS's will be mostly direct-aisle access, while QF's are all step-over or be stepped-over.

03 Oct 2011

Total posts 39

Oops, sorry, I was thinking only of QF's 747 and A380 J seats, not their new A330s, which will have all-aisle access.

Correct, I was talking about QFs A330 fleet. Given how this is the fleet that typically operates within Asia, the new Business Suite is the product with which the new MAS will be competing.

Apologies for the lack of clarity.

12 Jul 2013

Total posts 22

Did SQ not say long back that they dont see demand for PE..

25 Sep 2013

Total posts 1242

Times change. SQ lost a lot of customers to CX who does have Y+.

asw
asw

Singapore Airlines - KrisFlyer

08 Aug 2012

Total posts 31

Yes, esp. from ports such as ADL where the SG Regional A330 J is only a fraction better than CX Y+ but with price savings.

SQ is great though long-haul.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

26 Sep 2011

Total posts 77

I regard Premium Economy as one of the airlines' greatest con jobs. For considerably more than a full Y class fare you get a seat possibly an inch wider than Economy, and Economy meal served in a business class style and possibly a better set of headphones - and if you care about headphones you'll already have your own

There was a review recently on another site of SQ's PE offering and the conclusion was (I paraphrase) "don't bother"

I pretty much felt the same when I sat in QF's PE cabin when they used to fly the Dallas flight to Sydney via Brisbane, so domestic passengers could take that flight. As a QFF Gold I was assigned PE. I'd never bother paying for it

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

08 Sep 2012

Total posts 236

In fairness to Qantas, they offer one of the better Premium Economy products on the market, especially when it comes to food where you get a meal that's more business class than economy. 

As a tall bulky guy PE is attractive. But if i had to chose between a full PE product witj a different seat or an 'economy plus' product where it was jusy extra legroom (35 inches is enough) but for only another  8-10% (like the US carriers offer), I'd take the economy plus option.

I'd rather just pay for space than other frills which don't add much to my comfort.

12 Dec 2012

Total posts 1031

Just what are you basing your generalised statement of PE on?

Of the airlines currently offering some form of "Premium Economy", almost all of them have a different idea of what it is and will thus run it in different ways. You can't just say "Premium Economy is x" and claim that for all airlines using the term. You didn't even mention the extra leg room on QF PE.

Your claim that QF used to run DFW-SYD via BNE so "domestic passengers could take that flight" just proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. The ONLY reason QF used to operate QF8 via BNE was because the west bound wind prevented the 747-400ER from operating directly to SYD without a fuel stop.

03 Oct 2011

Total posts 39

Your claim that QF used to run DFW-SYD via BNE so "domestic passengers could take that flight" just proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. The ONLY reason QF used to operate QF8 via BNE was because the west bound wind prevented the 747-400ER from operating directly to SYD without a fuel stop.

I'm not the poster who wrote that, but my interpretation is not that QF ran the flight with the stop so that domestic flyers could take it, but the other way around: because the flight had a stop, domestic flyers could use it.

If AA introduce Prem Economy then on the routes with those planes the Systems Wide Upgrades might only get you from economy to prem economy instead of business class which would leave some unhappy punters!!

03 Oct 2011

Total posts 39

Yes, this would be a major reduction in the value of an SWU.

12 Dec 2012

Total posts 1031

AA currently considers its Main Cabin Extra seating to be "premium economy". Does this mean they might be willing to reconsider what they see as "premium economy"?

03 Oct 2011

Total posts 39

I don't believe AA considers MCE as PE.  AA doesn't consider MCE to be a separate cabin nor a separate class.  Instead, AA says these are more desirable seats.

25 Sep 2013

Total posts 1242

I seem to recall that MH's strategy going forward was to concentrate on regional and mid-haul routes.  Would there actually be a demand for premium economy on these shorter flights (shorter than true long-haul)?

There may be. It depends on how the product is positioned.

If the PE product is just "economy plus" then it won't really have too much appeal. I mean, a little more legroom doesn't make too much of a distance for a flight that's less than 7 hours.

If the PE product is a "business lite" that is meaningfully differentiated from the Economy product (we can argue that the fully-flat-beds-with-mostly-direct-aisle-access of the Business Class constitute sufficient differentiation from PE to Business), there will be more of a case for it as appealling to travellers who want an upgraded experience yet don't need/want a fully flat bed.

Its an issue of finding the sweet spot. The value of comfort increases with the length of the flight. MH is allegedly planning on shifting to a mostly medium-haul route network over time, so the "sweet spot" in the market narrows a bit. Too much of a "business lite" = cannibalizing business, but if its only a slight improvement on economy then less people will be enticed.

25 Sep 2013

Total posts 1242

Your treatise in general could apply to any airline considering introducing premium economy.

British Airways - Executive Club

07 Sep 2012

Total posts 47

I believe the only airline that flew a successful and affordable Premium Economy product is EVA Air (Taiwan). They were one of the first airlines to introduce Evergreen Deluxe class in the early 90s, and were successful in maintaining it through to even now.

Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer

28 Dec 2011

Total posts 95

It all depends on cost. We were Y class uses, but now fly J+. Would consider a Y- as in Business light. That is a Y- would have sloping seat (170degree) with same service as J+, because to paraphrase Bill Clinton,

"It's the seat and room stupid" that count!!


Hi Guest, join in the discussion on American Airlines, Malaysia Airlines considering premium economy