Why Qantas didn't fit 2-4-2 economy seating to the Boeing 787-9
Page
- 1
- 2
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Why Qantas didn't fit 2-4-2 economy seating to the Boeing 787-9
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Why Qantas didn't fit 2-4-2 economy seating to the Boeing 787-9
OOLflyer
OOLflyer
Member since 13 Feb 2017
Total posts 8
I'm sorry, but this is not how we model these things.
aniljak
aniljak
Member since 15 Sep 2012
Total posts 99
Japan airlines decision to go 2-4-2 on their dreamliners has been a great decision for them. Every travel forum is comparing Qantas's cramped seating against Japan airlines! They are getting the good publicity without having to do anything! The average public do research their flights on internet and look at comfort and price, despite what some people think. Economy passengers are far more savvy than airlines give crdit to
traveller90
traveller90
Member since 29 Jan 2012
Total posts 6
Totally agree. - the majority of passengers today are price focused, with schedules and aircraft types secondary, let alone worrying about seating configurations. The old days are gone and the new budget aviator is not ruling the skies.
David
David
Member since 24 Oct 2010
Total posts 1,021
richard89
richard89
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
Member since 21 Mar 2017
Total posts 43
Oh my god. So many arm chair CEOs. I've flown NZs 789 multi times, their 3-3-3 is totally fine. Everyone get over yourselves. If you want comfort pay for PE. If you can't afford it then fly via Japan.
Luke49
Luke49
Virgin Australia - Velocity Rewards
Member since 17 Aug 2017
Total posts 28
It's all very interesting on people's thoughts. I guess QF and passengers will just have to wait and see. The PER-LHR may be very popular or passengers may avoid the 3-3-3 for 17 hours? Personally I will avoid 17 hours straight in Economy even Premium Economy.