Lufthansa adds €72 ‘green tax’ to airfares

More European airlines are expected to follow in levying an ‘environmental cost surcharge’.

By David Flynn, June 26 2024
Lufthansa adds €72 ‘green tax’ to airfares

Lufthansa, Swiss and other members of the Lufthansa Group are introducing a passenger surcharge of up to €72 (AU$115) to cover the rising costs of alternative fuels needed to lower aircraft emissions.

The new levies will apply to all departures on Lufthansa Group flights from the European Union, the UK, Norway and Switzerland from January 1 2025, and includes bookings made from June 26, 2024.

The amount of the surcharge varies depending on both the route and the travel class, but spans from €1 to €72.

For example, the short hop between Munich and London will see a €2 surcharge on any one-way economy class ticket and €3 in business class.

For longer trips such as Frankfurt to New York, Lufthansa’s ‘green tax’ stands at €27 on a one-way business class ticket and €54 in first class.

Lufthansa says its ‘environmental cost surcharge’ has been made necessary by EU-mandated measures such as a ‘statutory blending quota’ for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) for departures from European Union countries from January 2025.

A statement issued by the Lufthansa Group – which also includes Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Eurowings – said the group “will not be able to bear the successively increasing additional costs resulting from regulatory requirements in the coming years on its own.”

“Part of these expected costs for the year 2025 are now to be covered by the new Environmental Cost Surcharge.”

And those costs could increase as the years roll on.

The EU’s “mandatory SAF blending quota” requires that 2% of all jet fuel should contain sustainable aviation fuel from 2025, notching up to 6% from 2030, then jumping to 20% from 2035 and 70% from 2050.

The Lufthansa Group claims “this will lead to additional costs in the billions in the future.”

Other airlines across Europe could follow Lufthansa’s lead in passing on this EU-legislated cost of lowering carbon emissions to passengers.

Many airlines around the world – including British Airways, Cathay Pacific, Singapore Airlines and Qantas – have set a target of operating 5-10% of flights using sustainable aviation fuel by 2030, in order to reduce overall emissions to 25% of 2019 levels.

This is considered a milestone on the ambitious path to ‘net zero emissions’ by 2050 – a measure which airline industry body IATA estimates will be largely based on the use of sustainable aviation fuel, along with the adoption of electric and hydrogen engines plus “offsets and carbon capture”.

Lufthansa has already introduced a special class of ‘Economy Green’ fares. Priced between mid-range Economy Classic and Economy Flex tickets, the green fares promise “More sustainable flying through SAF (20%) and emissions offsetting (80%)” while adding “20% Miles and 20% Points and Qualifying Points.” 

However, those ‘do good, feel good’ fares are also priced at a premium: on an economy trip between Frankfurt and London, an Economy Green ticket can cost €281 compared to €216 for a no-frills Economy Light fare, €260 for Economy Classic and €295 for Economy Flex.

23 Oct 2014

Total posts 236

Until the flight actually has green fuel loaded - it’s really a con on the customer. If the flight doesn’t contain green fuel - why should these customers pay. If it’s loaded totally get it- but this signalling is getting extreme. Avoid Lufthansa.  Once green fuel is in the tanks sure - user pays for the new cost at a choice.

I’d support the green move once established and feel it’s 100% correct direction for a more sustainable travel industry  - but it’s got to happen first. Set up costs etc are for government grants / subsidies and corporations to implement - consumers pay tax / levee once the service is offered and supplied on said flight.

Singapore Airlines - The PPS Club

30 Nov 2015

Total posts 8

Supporting the transition to better fuel use is easy. Expecting your customer to pay for it when you have operating profits of 1.7 billion euros and crying poor is not so easy to swallow.

Etihad - Etihad Guest

21 Jul 2019

Total posts 169

Are readers genuinely surprised? When was the last time a positive development EVER came out mediocre Lufthansa??

Sustainable aviation fuel????  Has this even been developed yet?

Sounds more like a subsidy for Lufthansa along with all the others with their fingers in the honey pot.

31 Dec 2014

Total posts 47

How does an economy green ticket promising 20% SAF work? Does the plane have two fuel tanks? One for normal passengers and another just for these higher paying suckers (sorry) guests?

This is just a price hike under a different name.

P1
P1

24 Apr 2017

Total posts 81

Pretty pathetic to charge business class an first class more, I didn't realise there were different graded of fuels for different classes of flight!

P1
P1

24 Apr 2017

Total posts 81

Pretty pathetic to charge business class an first class more, I didn't realise there were different grades of fuels for different classes of flight!

SCM
SCM

28 Sep 2022

Total posts 16

Really stupid - if people want green fuel and are willing to pay more for it, then they will. This is completely unnecessary, and it's especially unnecessary considering everything else EU is doing to kill air travel and make it more expensive!


Hi Guest, join in the discussion on Lufthansa adds €72 ‘green tax’ to airfares