What it’ll be like to fly on the Airbus A321XLR
Airbus wants to close the comfort gap between the A321XLR and the A350.
Executive Traveller exclusive
Airbus is counting down to the debut of the A321XLR, with the first of the ‘extra-long range’ single-aisle jets due to be handed over to Spain’s Iberia in the coming weeks, ahead of flights from late October.
Qantas will be the first airline in the Asia-Pacific region to fly the A321XLR, with deliveries slated from April 2025.
These red-tailed jets will not only replace Qantas’ workhorse Boeing 737 on domestic routes and short hops to New Zealand, Fiji and Noumea – they can take on longer international routes which usually need a larger twin-aisle Airbus A330 or Boeing 787.
Hong Kong, Bangkok, Manila, Tokyo and even India are all within the A321XLR’s reach, depending on which Australian city it flies from.
So whether it’s the 90-minute dash from Sydney to Melbourne, a five-hour transcontinental trek between Australia’s east and west coasts or a ten-hour stretch into Asia, the A321XLR is a little jet with a lot of promise.
But what will it be like to fly on the A321XLR? And more to the point, will passengers feel confined spending long hours in the relatively close quarters of this compact single-aisle jet?
“That’s a concern that we took very seriously,” says Antonio Da-Costa, who heads the marketing team for Airbus’ single-aisle jets… and as it happens, Airbus drew some solace from the mighty Boeing 747
“We did a lot of passenger research, and one of the things that came out was that when you ask business travellers what was their favourite cabin, many came back saying the 747 upper deck… it was perceived to be a very exclusive environment, a more cosy arrangement, more a corporate jet than a commercial aircraft.”
Da-Costa expects passengers will feel the same on A321XLR jets of customers Iberia and American Airlines, for starters, which will come with a private lie-flat business class suite on either side of the aisle.
“You have direct access to the aisle and direct access to the window, so you have the best of both worlds,” Da-Costa tells Executive Traveller.
“And the fact that you’re in a smallish cabin for business class (means) you do have this sense of exclusivity, of being in an exclusive little cabin.”
The inside story
From the outside, the A321XLR looks like any of its shorter-range siblings from the A320neo family – including the long-range A321LR – although an underbelly bulge behind the wings conceals a high-capacity fuel tank to boost its range to a staggering 8,700km, or up to 11 hours of flying in a standard airline configuration.
But inside, Airbus wants the A321XLR to deliver the same passenger experience as its larger twin-aisle cousins.
“We want to make the comfort experience seamless to the A330neo or the A350,” Da-Costa explains. “We have the same Airspace design in the cabin, so the look and feel of the A321XLR cabin is similar to that of the wide-bodies.”
Even the A321XLR’s slightly wider cabin, compared to the competing Boeing 737, “enables you to have pretty much the same seat width as on a wide-body aircraft,” Da-Costa says.
“If you’re flying in economy, it’s an 18-inch wide seat. And in business, we’re already seeing 321LR customers putting in lie-flat seats… even on the XLR, the lead customer Iberia has already announced that they’re installing fully lie-flat seats at the front of the cabin.”
(And while Qantas is installing domestic-grade business class recliners on its first A321XLRs, the airline is considering lie-flat beds for a second tranche of jets which will mainly be flown on international routes.)
Big bins for the win
However, Da-Costa cites the A321XLR’s generously-sized overhead bins as “my favourite feature.”
“The extra large bins enable every passenger to take a roller bag on board. That’s always my bug bear… today you’re always fighting to make sure that your bag is not that far from you.”
While these plus-sized bins are optional – airlines can also choose standard-sized bins – Da-Costa notes that most airlines are specifying them for the A321LR or XLR.
“On long-haul flights, it’s very common that everybody brings some relatively large pieces of luggage by cabin standards.”
Nor will passengers on the A321XLR have to put up with the loud droning thrum of engines, with Da-Costa proud that “this is the quietest single-aisle in the market.”
“When you’re spending up to 11 hours inside the cabin, you appreciate having a lower noise level which is again comparable to the wide-bodies.”
“Another feature which is also very important for a long flight is the LED mood lighting.”
Customisable across 16.2 million colours, it allows airlines “to programme the intensity and the colour of the light according to the flight segment” and help take the edge off jet-lag.
Airbus also altered the shape of the frame or bezel surrounding the A321XLR’s windows, which makes them seem slightly larger “and brings a sense of extra space into the cabin.”
“Now you have a more curved shape around the window itself, which makes it easier for passengers to look outside the window,” Da-Costa explains.
“In fact, it gives the perception that the window is bigger just by the fact that you now have more space around the window frame.”
More room for more meals
Another concern voiced by many frequent business class travellers is how the limited kitchen galley space on this single-aisle plane will impact meal service – especially the provision of a second full meal closer to your destination.
“That’s a fair concern,” Da-Costa admits, “so we’ve made sure that we have galley space that’s adequate to serve the two full meals that you expect on an 11-hour flight.”
This includes a more efficient galley design which can also “take advantage of extra space that was unused between the galley and the bulkhead.”
Airlines also have the option of an additional galley in their cabin layout, and without naming names, Da-Costa says “we’ve seen some customers electing to increase the galley space.”
Even the premium layout of the A321XLR’s business class cabin for long-range flights can play a part, “because you end up with less passengers on board relative to a domestic flight.”
“When you’re talking of the 321LR or XLR, we’ve been seeing seat counts between 170 to 190 seats. On a more conventional A321 domestic configuration we tend to see 220 seats and north of that. So by that natural effect of having less passengers on board, you have more galley space per passenger.”
09 May 2016
Total posts 20
I cannot think of anything less I would like to do is fly 8 to 10 in one of those planes, now matter I new and fancy they are., regardless of class.
11 Sep 2015
Total posts 225
Why? If you were in a good business class suite with privacy and a flat bed, what would be the major differences between this and say an A330nro or A350? The only one I can think of is that the A321XLR's in-cabin altitude might be higher than an A350 for example, so the plane would be a bit less effective at reducing jetlag.
Qantas
19 Apr 2012
Total posts 1429
There was the 707 and DC8 back in the day. Much the same layout.
20 Nov 2015
Total posts 477
Sure, I'd rather be in an A350 than an A321XLR, even if the general business class proposition was on par, although we know of course there won't be A321XLR Qsuites for example, the photos in this article show what airlines are doing and it's not really as spacious as an A350.
But how I look at it is that if the A321XLR lets an airline open up new non-stop routes which are not profitable for a wide-body jet, then I'd rather be on an A3212XLR than not at all, or to be able to fly direct instead of waste half as many hours as the direct flight would be by doing a stopover. That's going to be the big difference for Qantas when the A321XLRs move onto international routes. For example, flying straight into Phuket instead of having to go via Bangkok.
03 May 2013
Total posts 683
I'm not sure about the hype around making the XLR a "wide body experience". It's still an old aluminium fuselage, thus humidity and pressurisation will be old school - meaning jet lag inducing old technology. Only the A350 and B787 (A380 to a lesser extent)offer true up-to-date technology as far as cabin experience goes. Quiet engines and more insulation are nice but don't cut it for long haul flights airlines intend the XLR to fly.
18 Sep 2015
Total posts 138
I'd hate to book on a mooted QF international config XLR for an overnight flight only to find they had swapped it out for a domestic config. They should put lie flats in all of them.
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer - Chairmans Lounge
01 Sep 2011
Total posts 416
Oh please not seats where the window is over your shoulder. Awful situation to have.
05 Mar 2015
Total posts 416
Unfortunately if you have any sort of 'herringbone' layout to maximise the number of seats, which of course keeps airfares down, then a config facing the aisle is the most efficient. If you have the seat at the aisle and facing the window, then the corner of the seat protrudes into the space needed to get into and out of the seat. The photo at the start of this article shows a layout where the seat faces straight ahead, which is great but not as efficient for getting more seats into the same floorspace.
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
09 Jun 2017
Total posts 76
I still don’t understand why QF are bringing in the XLR to replace 737 workhorses. An 11 hour capable plane potentially with 2 configurations covering both long haul as well as 1 and 2 hour hops just does not make sense to me.
05 Mar 2015
Total posts 416
Well I can guarantee it makes sense to the people at Qantas, who of course have all the numbers and data to make that decision. I read an article somewhere which says an important factor is the A321XLR's cargo capacity, because cargo is where Qantas makes a lot of money, especially on international routes. Plus the A321XLR's range means it can do routes beyond the 737's range but also routes which are not economical on an A330 or B787 due to lower demand. And you can bet that Qantas will make the most of the A321XLR by combining routes, eg SYD-MEL, MEL-CBR, CBR-AKL, AKL-BNE, that sort of thing. Higher 'utilisation' is what it's all about because you don't want expensive planes sitting on the ground, and the A321XLR's range will give more scope for that higher utilisation.
Qantas
19 Apr 2012
Total posts 1429
It keeps them busy with longer range overnight trips.
20 Sep 2024
Total posts 7
@ AsiaBizTraveller
“Sure, I'd rather be in an A350 than an A321XLR, even if the general business class proposition was on par. But how I look at it is that if the A321XLR lets an airline open up new non-stop routes which are not profitable for a wide-body jet, then I'd rather be on an A3212XLR than not at all"
This is what our civic leaders are talking to Qantas about. In Townsville the narrow body with its 170-190 seating is doable Townsville to Singapore direct about 7hrs 30min
"To be able to fly direct instead of waste half as many hours as the direct flight would be by doing a stopover "
For us a costly air flight to Cairns to catch a SQ A350 Singapore, (drive for 4hrs) or a long trip to Brisbane to just to fly north back over Townsville. I agree with your views.
22 Sep 2017
Total posts 93
Or they might take you on an E190 via Darwin. (DRW-SIN starting in December.)
20 Sep 2024
Total posts 7
@Russh7
Or they might take you on an E190 via Darwin. (DRW-SIN starting in December.)
Qantas has delayed the launch of its new route between Darwin and Singapore, which was due to start in December.
The carrier has told customers that the new service will now take off in March 2025 due to operational and network scheduling issues.
Yes, this was discussed when the CEO of Qantaslink Ms Rachel Yangoyan was in Townsville about starting a link from Townsville ,Darwin ,Singapore with E190 or by March the new Qantaslink A220-300. Better than flying to Brisbane, grateful if they do start a service out Townsville.
20 Sep 2024
Total posts 7
@ QFPI
‘’I read an article somewhere which says an important factor is the A321XLR's cargo capacity, because cargo is where Qantas makes a lot of money, especially on international routes’
The A321XLR would be great for ourRich Food Bowl
Export Box Chilled meat, Seafood such as prawns, crayfish, mangoes, bananas, etc.
Any unutilised cargo capacity could be utilised for freight movement with any of the above produce. Just 7 hours flying time to Singapore,produce is on the table the next day.
Currently producers need to road freight their product to Cairns, some 8 hours (or Brisbane) for many, exposing the goods to double handling. Road freight also raises their shipment costs. Estimations show that there could be up to 4 Tonnes available or more, dependant on passenger numbers, baggage weights, runway length parameters and no doubt fuel load.
This would be a game changer for our primary producers in Townsville and North Queensland
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
13 Nov 2018
Total posts 117
Guys, it is more about capacity and refuelling. If you have an XLR with a high capacity cabin and no need to refuel after a few sectors, it means that the turnaround times can be reduced even further. If an aircraft is on the ground, it’s not earning a dollar. But, I can guarantee you; if I find there is an A320 XLR on my route with seats facing towards the centre like a bloody coffin showroom, I won’t be flying it. Qantas, please take note.
05 Mar 2015
Total posts 416
But the more fuel a plane is carrying, the more it burns due to the additional weight, so why would Qantas fill up the fuel tank to the point needed for say 10 hours of flying and then fly an A321XLR SYD-BNE-SYD-MEL-ADL-MEL-SYD for example without refuelling at any point wouldn't the extra weight of all that 'excess' fuel end up costing them more money to carry in the first place, instead of refuelling at each airport as needed?
It's a bit like what they do with the A330s flying MEL-SYD-PER for example, they don't even fill the water tank to full capacity at MEL, they put in enough water for the short MEL-SYD leg and then at SYD they fill up the tank to meet the needs of the longer SYD-PER flight, this way they are not burning extra fuel on MEL-SYD carrying water they don't need and which they can get at SYD. Why wouldn't the same logic apply to actual fuel?
Qantas - Qantas Frequent Flyer
13 Nov 2018
Total posts 117
Depends on the price of fuel and the cost, weight benefit. I can guarantee you there is an algorithm for that somewhere. They even have an algorithm in the Flight computers to tell the pilots how fast they can possibly go. That’s why Qantas can usually make up time when they’re delayed, but other airlines can’t.
if yours is expensive, I suppose they won’t fly around with it but if they get a good contract and fuel is relatively cheap then why wouldn’t you reduce the time on the ground? Once again, if it’s not in the air, it’s not earning a dollar.
05 Feb 2015
Total posts 24
Shelf bins and a fancy spade pattern on the ceiling do not make a cabin modern IMO. The Boeing Sky Interior with its pivot bins is a far more attractive, and importantly for something that will be in use for decades, timeless interior.
Hi Guest, join in the discussion on What it’ll be like to fly on the Airbus A321XLR